SEVEN hundred people in York have lost a disability benefit since strict new assessments were introduced for a new type of payment.
Government figures show 500 people in York Central and 200 in York Outer who used to get Disability Living Allowance (DLA) do not get its replacement, Personal Independence Payment (PIP).
However, benefit increased for 500 in York Central, was unchanged for 100 and decreased for 200, while it increased for 300 in York Outer, was unchanged for 100 and decreased for 200.
York Central Labour MP Rachael Maskell said the Government announced its intention in 2015 to cut the benefit bill by £12 billion, and the figures ‘clearly showed’ it was trying to achieve this by restricting them to disabled people, adding:”The Government’s own statistics show that nearly half of people who were formerly receiving DLA saw their support fall or stop altogether when they were reassessed for PIP.”
York Outer Tory MP Julian Sturdy ‘welcomed’ news significantly more constituents had received either an increased or unchanged award since the switch to PIP, adding: “PIP ensures support is more targeted and reflects our increased understanding of disability. It’s designed to ensure mental health conditions are given the same recognition as physical ones, which wasn’t the case under DLA.”
The Government said the benefits were different with different assessment criteria, and DLA claimants were not automatically entitled to PIP, but the statistics did not include PIP decisions overturned under mandatory reconsideration or appeal. POP decisions were made on information provided by claimants and their doctor and anyone unhappy could appeal.
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel
You must verify your phone number before you can comment.
Please enter your phone number below, and a verification code will be sent to you by text message.
Please enter the six-digit verification code sent to you by SMS.
Your verification code has been sent a second time to the mobile phone number you provided.
Your verification code has been sent a third time to the mobile phone number you provided.
You have requested your verification code too many times. Please try again later.
Didn’t receive a code? Send it againThe code you entered has not been recognised.
Please try again
You have failed to enter a correct code after three attempts.
Please try again later.
Your phone number has been verified.
Your phone number has been stored with your account details. We will never use it for anything other than verifying that you are the legitimate owner of this account.